What’s the one factor that really determines whether teams need upskilling or reskilling?
Some capability conversations start with role changes or tech shifts, but the real friction shows much earlier. Teams feel the pull to fix performance gaps fast, while leaders debate whether the need is refinement or reinvention. That’s where capability prioritization starts to wobble. The volume of change hides the variable that should guide the first decision point.
The featured blog looks at how that variable clarifies the upskilling versus reskilling divide. Not in theory, but in the messy reality of shifting roles, stressed systems, and teams trying to stay competent while the ground keeps moving. The post is available now for leaders mapping 2026 capability plans.
The blog outlines how to:
| • |
Signs that show when skills should deepen versus when roles truly need to shift |
| • |
Why training often arrives too late to influence capability gaps |
| • |
Approaches that make upskilling stick in evolving roles |
| • |
When reskilling becomes the more stable long-term path |
Teams planning next year’s skills strategy can read the full post for a clearer way to prioritize capability work.
